The Chicago Bears traded for Jeffrey Simmons on Thursday, kicking off what feels like soon-to-be a chaotic chain of trade deadline events. Simmons has been one of the best, if not the best, defensive tackles in the NFL over the last few seasons, although an argument could be made that Detroit Lions DT Alim McNeill has had his number this season, specifically.
Defensive tackle, obviously, isn't a huge need for the Lions this year. Cornerback, safety, backup running back, and linebacker remain larger roster holes for them to manage as we careen towards the deadline, and it's unclear how aggressively the team is planning to be in order to address these holes.
How aggressive should general manager Brad Holmes be, though? Trading multiple first-rounders for Simmons seems like an aggressive, win-now choice for Bears GM Ryan Poles to have made, but will it pay off? Can it ever pay off to trade away such big draft capital for one player, who is expected to then transform your entire defensive unit?
These are the questions to keep in mind when arguing for, or against, an aggressive Lions trade deadline.
An argument for an aggressive Lions trade deadline
We know that the Lions' secondary is still a bit of a question mark. D.J. Reed has stepped up over the Lions' last two games, looking like the strong starting CB that Detroit signed in free agency back in 2025. However, he has no legitimate starting help next to him right now.
Ennis Rakestraw Jr. has been solid in coverage when given starting snaps, but he's a bit too green to be considered their bonafide starter - and, truth be told, the sample size is too small to say whether he's ready to really start for the rest of this season.
Adding a bonafide starting outside corner to this defense would transform a lot for them, and raise their ceiling as a contender overall. Their defensive line is elite, their offensive line is looking strong, their passing game is revived, and Jahmyr Gibbs is Gibbs. They're genuinely just missing a strong cornerback room, which could help with teams exploiting them over and over again with explosive playmaking.
Now, how would I define an aggressive trade deadline? I'd say using any Day 1 or Day 2 draft capital to snag a starting cornerback is aggressive.
This would be a move made to land someone like Sauce Gardner, who would command such a price tag after the Indianapolis Colts spent so many first-rounders to get him in the first place. Detroit could land a starting cornerback without dropping that much, though - someone like Kristian Fulton, Alontae Taylor, or Charvarius Ward would certainly not command a first-round pick.
It would be worth the Lions to get "aggressive" in this way, but I also don't think it's worth spending multiple first-rounders on cornerback talent.
An argument against an aggressive trade deadline
A non-aggressive trade deadline would mean the Lions are looking to add on the margins - their bread and butter. Adding a cheap RB2 option, or another backup cornerback that could have the talent to become a starter, feels like what a non-aggressive deadline would net.
Another version of a non-aggressive deadline? Getting Brian Branch and Kerby Joseph back, and Rakestraw continuing to improve, and calling those "trade deadline acquisitions." As a New York Yankees fan, this is a common practice: the team loves to do nothing at the deadline, claim that some players coming off the IL are acquisitions, in a way, and then they dodge accountability when the team still fails to perform or advance in the postseason. Wash, rinse, repeat.
READ MORE: Lions must figure out stuff rate issue ahead of tough Vikings matchup
I'm not saying that this is what the Lions are going to do, or that they'd even be wrong to say something like this. Joseph and Branch are huge gets for Detroit, and assuming Joseph gets added back to the active roster, they create a fearsome duo in the secondary. That solves a bit problem for the Lions.
But, of course, hearing something like this after the Bears' move is going to fall just a bit flat - assuming they stand pat.
However, it remains to be seen how blowing up your draft capital really guarantees a Super Bowl berth, or win. Adding on the margins could be the move for Detroit to make, as they already have a contending roster at this point.
Add us as a preferred source on Google