Golden Tate a Welcome Addition to Detroit Lions’ Thin Receiving Corps
By Kent Platte
Cary Edmondson-USA TODAY Sports
Some national media folks considered the Lions drafting of Eric Ebron with the 10th overall pick to be overkill after securing prized wide receiver free agent Golden Tate. The reaction to the Lions signing Tate was mixed, but generally well-received. One common argument against signing Tate was, and I quote, “He is probably the third best receiver on the Seahawks roster!”.
That argument no doubt fueled by Madden ratings. People who use sources other than Madden, however, generally cite Golden Tate’s consistent improvement, elite hands, and fiery presence as good compliments to the Lions roster that is notorious for drops and poor receiver play.
Golden Tate has been looking like a perfect accent to Calvin Johnson two preseason games in, and he’s been doing so without Calvin Johnson on the field. That used to be a death knell for the Lions’ chances of fielding a competent offense as Johnson requires so much attention and game planning from defensive coordinators. With Tate on the field, the Lions have someone, finally, who can relieve some of that pressure.
But how did the Lions have poor receiver play? With Matthew Stafford quickly becoming one of the most prolific passers in the NFL, at least in terms of the amount of passes he’s throwing, how is it that his receivers have played so poorly? Those numbers go hand in hand, right? Well, sort of.
The average catch percentage for a WR is equal to the average completion percentage for QBs, or around 60%. The easy thing about catch percentage on a single team is that the ‘average’ number is always going to be the QB’s completion percentage, so any number lower than that is a receiver not doing their job well. In the case of Matthew Stafford, his career number is only slightly below that 60% number, making for easy math.
Live Feed
GMEN HQ
Since 2010, the Lions have had six receivers and four tight ends catch more than 10 passes on a season. 10 catches is a very low number, as you’d expect, so that number is somewhat alarming over four seasons. Taking a look at receptions speaks to the ability to produce volume in an NFL offense. Those players are listed here in order of the number of targets :
Player Name | Targets | |
Calvin Johnson | 670 | |
Brandon Pettigrew | 407 | |
Nate Burleson | 299 | |
Tony Scheffler | 214 | |
Titus Young | 151 | |
Kris Durham | 106 | |
Bryant Johnson | 49 | |
Ryan Broyles | 46 | |
Joseph Fauria | 30 | |
Will Heller | 23 |
Of those ten players, five are no longer on the roster (Burleson, Scheffler, Young, Johnson, and Heller). Of the remaining five, only Calvin Johnson and Brandon Pettigrew have caught more than 10 passes a season twice. Two players. Of the remaining three, one was a rookie (Fauria), one has injury concerns (Broyles), and the third had one of the worst drop percentages and catch rates in the NFL the past two seasons.
Tate, meanwhile, has had more than 10 catches in all four of his NFL seasons, in fact he’s had more than 20 catches in all of them. Tate can no doubt carry the volume that will be expected of him in the Lions offense, probably a larger volume than they have been accustomed to giving their #2.
The Lions receiving corps has seen a ton of volume due to their heavy passing schemes, but what about efficiency? We already know they had one of the highest drop rates in the NFL over the past few season, but what about their catch rates? Using the same group of receivers, the numbers aren’t very promising.
Player Name | Targets | Receptions | Catch Percentage | Season |
Will Heller | 23 | 17 | 73.91% | 2012 |
Nate Burleson | 55 | 39 | 70.91% | 2013 |
Ryan Broyles | 32 | 22 | 68.75% | 2012 |
Golden Tate | 80 | 55 | 68.75% | 2012 |
Nate Burleson | 115 | 77 | 66.96% | 2011 |
Brandon Pettigrew | 131 | 87 | 66.41% | 2011 |
Brandon Pettigrew | 63 | 41 | 65.08% | 2013 |
Brandon Pettigrew | 111 | 71 | 63.96% | 2010 |
Nate Burleson | 86 | 55 | 63.95% | 2010 |
Golden Tate | 114 | 72 | 63.16% | 2013 |
Nate Burleson | 43 | 27 | 62.79% | 2012 |
Tony Scheffler | 72 | 45 | 62.50% | 2010 |
Calvin Johnson | 173 | 108 | 62.43% | 2011 |
Golden Tate | 58 | 35 | 60.34% | 2011 |
Tony Scheffler | 45 | 27 | 60.00% | 2011 |
Joseph Fauria | 30 | 18 | 60.00% | 2013 |
Calvin Johnson | 204 | 122 | 59.80% | 2010 |
Titus Young | 56 | 33 | 58.93% | 2012 |
Tony Scheffler | 12 | 7 | 58.33% | 2013 |
Brandon Pettigrew | 102 | 59 | 57.84% | 2012 |
Ryan Broyles | 14 | 8 | 57.14% | 2013 |
Calvin Johnson | 137 | 77 | 56.20% | 2010 |
Titus Young | 95 | 52 | 54.74% | 2011 |
Calvin Johnson | 156 | 84 | 53.85% | 2013 |
Golden Tate | 42 | 22 | 52.38% | 2010 |
Tony Scheffler | 85 | 42 | 49.41% | 2012 |
Kris Durham | 85 | 38 | 44.71% | 2013 |
Kris Durham | 21 | 8 | 38.10% | 2012 |
Bryant Johnson | 49 | 18 | 36.73% | 2010 |
I bolded Golden Tate’s name to point out that three of his four seasons were above that 60% mark. Additionally, I italicized all of the players presently on the roster. Of the 9 seasons in that chart above 60%, 3 of them are Golden Tate. Surprisingly, 3 of them are also Brandon Pettigrew, whose hands are often considered suspect due to drops. Of the remaining 3, only one is a starter (Calvin Johnson).
The addition of someone like Golden Tate to this roster was a very underrated acquisition. The alternative to Tate at this point would be hoping for Broyles’ health or running with someone like Kris Durham as a starter. Durham, as you’ll notice, boasts the second and third worst catch percentage of all Lions receivers over the past four seasons.
Adding a player who is not only sure handed (Lowest drop rate in the NFL over the past four seasons) who is also consistently catching the football (3/4 seasons above 60%) is an obvious and glaring upgrade over a player with one of the worst drop rates and catch percentages in football over the past two seasons. Will the Lions capitalize on Golden Tate and his strong hands? 2014 looks promising.