Greg Schiano Presents an Interesting Alternative to Kickoffs

Rutgers coach Greg Schiano started questioning the kickoff status quo following a collision that left one of his players, Eric LeGrand, paralyzed. As a result, he has come up with an alternative idea that seems feasible at the college and pro level. I became aware of his plan through twitter (h/t TomLeyden and TomVH), I figured it was worth a read since I respect them both. I’ll admit that I was skeptical about what I might find as I clicked on the link but I was pleasantly surprised.

Steve Politi laid out the basics of Schiano’s plan on

This is Schiano’s plan: Replace all kickoffs with a punting situation, including after the opening coin toss and to start the second half. So, as an example, when Team A scores a touchdown, it immediately gets the ball back on a fourth and 15 from its own 30-yard line.
It can punt it back to Team B — the most likely outcome and a safer play since the bigger collisions usually happen on kickoffs.
Or it can line up and go for the first down, essentially replacing an onside kick with an offensive play that would require more skill than luck.

I’m intrigued.

Player safety has become a hot issue over the last couple years as more is becoming known about the long-term effects of repeated head trauma. The aforementioned article quotes one coach that likens kickoffs to a 70-yard blitz. While a long kickoff return can have an important impact on the game, kickoffs are generally quite low on the list of important plays throughout the course of a game. Given the fact that kickoffs are among the most dangerous plays in game, one has to wonder if they are worth the cost.

With NFL net punting averages in the neighborhood of 38-yards, Schiano’s proposal as stated would shift average starting field position in the receiving team’s favor. Slight adjustments to make “kickoff punts” distinct from fourth down punts like a no-rush and block rule could make the difference negligible. This issue aside, the proposal seems to accomplish everything a kickoff does without the risk of devastating collisions. The option to attempt to gain 15 yards to retain possession is a nice low-percentage alternative to the onside kick and the option to punt retains a portion of the return game rather than removing it entirely.

What do you think?

Like what you see? Give SideLion Report a “like” on facebook, become a follower on twitter, or grab our RSS feed.

Next Lions Game View full schedule »
Monday, Sep 88 Sep7:10New York GiantsBuy Tickets
Dick's Sporting Goods presents "Hell Week":

Tags: Kickoffs NCAA NFL Rule Changes

  • Christopher Williams

    Very interesting. It accomplishes everything, but teans with elite kick returns are hurt. I understand 4th and 15 is a long way and being on your 30 is def something to think about, but if a team has a hot pass game, instead of. Beimg a shoot out the game could be literally one sides. I have my concerns, but id like to see it action first before I dismiss it. It has potential

    • Zac Snyder

      It is a good enough potential to at least be taken under consideration.

  • Matt Snyder

    The “4th and 15″ would be even more exciting than an onside kick. It would seem to be more “skill based” at least.

    I’m not necessarily in love with the punt idea though (but I don’t hate it). Perhaps the scoring team (the “kicking team”, if you will) could choose to go for the “4th and 15″ or give the other team the ball at the 20 or 25 yard line.

  • Pingback: LeGrand’s legacy: Schiano pushing for rule change – (blog) | Football News and Topics